![]() ![]() ![]() Given their age, plants are beginning to close, with 25% of existing nuclear capacity in advanced economies expected to be shut down by 2025. However the nuclear fleet in advanced economies is 35 years old on average and many plants are nearing the end of their designed lifetimes. In emerging and developing economies, particularly China, the nuclear fleet will provide low-carbon electricity for decades to come. In the absense of further lifetime extensions and new projects could result in an additional 4 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions, underlining the importance of the nuclear fleet to low-carbon energy transitions around the globe. It recommends several possible government actions that aim to ensure existing nuclear power plants can operate as long as they are safe, support new nuclear construction and encourage new nuclear technologies to be developed. This report identifies the even greater challenges of attempting to follow this path with much less nuclear power. It requires large increases in efficiency and renewables investment, as well as an increase in nuclear power. Achieving the pace of CO2 emissions reductions in line with the Paris Agreement is already a huge challenge, as shown in the Sustainable Development Scenario. ![]() It is shown that, without action, nuclear power in advanced economies could fall by two thirds by 2040.The implications of such a “nuclear fade case” for costs, emissions and electricity security using two World Energy Outlook scenarios are examined in the New Policies Scenario and the Sustainable Development Scenario. This report focuses on the role of nuclear power in advanced economies and the factors that put nuclear power at risk of future decline. However, in advanced economies, nuclear power has begun to fade, with plants closing and little new investment made, just when the world requires more low-carbon electricity. Over the past 50 years, the use of nuclear power has reduced CO2 emissions by over 60 gigatonnes – nearly two years’ worth of global energy-related emissions. Together, they provide three-quarters of global low-carbon generation. All rights reserved.Nuclear power and hydropower form the backbone of low-carbon electricity generation. FINDENERGY is a comparison and research website that does not directly offer any energy related products.Ĭopyright © 2022 - 2023 Find Energy LLC. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners, and are used by FINDENERGY only to describe products and services offered by each respective trademark holder. This data is not always in agreement with annually released government data due to differences in calculation methods and time periods. Additionally, this data is compiled using known ownership relationships between power plants and electricity providers, while some of these relationships remain unknown. These 12 month periods may vary from provider to provider and from power plant to power plant, as some entities are required to report on a rolling monthly basis others report on an annual basis. Unless otherwise noted, all data is a compilation of the most recent 12 months of government released data. North Carolina Electric Member Cooperativeĭisclaimer: The data displayed on this page may be incomplete or incorrect. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() This may seem trivial, but it will save you a lot of time when dealing with large data sets, especially imported data or spreadsheets from other people.ĭownload the sample workbook that accompanies this tutorial so you can try this out. You can adjust the rows in the exact same way.
![]() ![]() If a system is OC'd, then obviously stability should be tested so that's what it get's used for!įor how long it takes, depends on the response from the first test.if the temps are good and OC is stable on the first CPU test, then move onto GPU, then PSU. If a system is stock, I'll still run it to see how it can cope with heavier than normal loads. 95% of my situations, OCCT does it all and allows me to vet out instabilities. Frankly though, that's more depending on the system and situation. I don't use Prime or IBT, though sometimes I'll expand and use Aida64, Intel XTU, Asus ROG Realbench, etc. I'm not saying OCCT is the end-all for stress tests.but for me it's a solid suite of tests that get the job done and have for years. ![]() ![]() If your system is stable for what you do, then it's stable for what you do and that's all. I like to find a happy medium of testing and real-world use. Some folks take stability seriously some don't (until it's an issue and they're on here pissed their system keeps BSOD'ing and can't figure it out.). I voted on your sarcastic first option, though it doesn't do a good job of explaining what I do and why I do it. But I stand behind a reputation of building bullet-proof PC's, and to verify they'll do that I run OCCT's series of tests. Windows 10 Pro 圆4 | Windows Server 2019 (Hyper-V) | Windows Server 2019 (Hyper-V)ĭepends on the build. HyperX Alloy Core RGB | Dell USB Keyboard (KVM) Logitech G502 | Dell USB Laser Mouse (KVM) Noctua NH-U14S Push-Pull + NT-H1 | Stock Intel Cooler + AC MX4 | Stock Intel Cooler + AC MX4ģ2GB (2x16) DDR4 4000 3600 | 16GB (4x4) Samsung DDR3-1600 | 32GB (4x8) Mushkin Stealth DDR3-1600ĮVGA RTX 3060 Ti FTW3 | Onboard Intel HD 4000 | Onboard Intel HD 4600Ģ50GB M.2 + 960GB SATA SSD, 1x2TB | 120GB SSD, RAID10 6x2TB (6TB) | 120GB SSD, RAID10 6x3TB (9TB)Īcer 28" 4K VG280K x2 | 19" Dell on KVM.mostly headless operation.Ĭorsair 600C - Stock Fans on Low | Lian Li Lancool PC-K7 - Cougar fans | Modified Lenovo TS430 CaseĪune T1 mk1 > AKG K553 Pro + JVC HA-RX 700 (Equalizer APO + PeaceUI) | Not in useĮVGA 750G2 Modular + APC Back-UPS Pro 1500 | EVGA KR500 80+ Bronze (Both) + APC Smart-UPS 1500 Kursah's Gaming Rig 2018 (2022 Upgrade) - Ryzen+ Edition | SpartanCore | SpartanCore2 ![]() ![]() Nintendo updated the original game with Remix mode, too, which provided addictive bite-size levels for quickfire play sessions. The fact that it looks so much like an entry in the 'New' branch of 2D Marios perhaps set expectations higher than they might have been for the first Mario game to appear on non-Nintendo hardware (for a very long time, at least), but this is a classy example of transitioning a beloved character and series to a totally different platform while embracing the differences of that platform with a tailormade experience. Mario runs automatically, vaulting over enemies and small obstacles, and you pull off tricks by tapping at the right moment, jumping high or low depending on how long you hold your finger on the screen. On its own terms, it's a solid effort with clever compromises to allow for the one-touch control scheme, and a great translation of the plumbers' 2D oeuvre into the smartphone space. Super Mario Run served as Nintendo's first foray into mobile gaming (unless you count the ill-fated Miitomo). With Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2 absolutely neck and neck, every rating counts! If you haven't rated your favourites yet, simply click on the 'star' and assign a score out of ten. ![]() It's entirely possible to influence the order, even after publication. Remember: the order below is updated in real-time according to each game's User Rating on this here website. In order to answer this question definitively, we asked Nintendo Life readers to rate the mainline Mario games they have played and the result is the ranked list you see below. All of them could easily be somebody's 'best game of all time', and there'll always be someone who believes the series peaked with The Lost Levels. ![]() What's the best Mario game ever? Where do you even begin to rank them? Let's face it, any of the games in the top 10 could justifiably take the top spot. If you're interested in Team Nintendo Life's personal takes, check out our video at the very end of the article, but the list below is based on the opinions of you lovely lot. Remember: This is subject to change depending on each game's User Rating on our database, so feel free to get rating the ones you've played with a score out of ten and potentially affect the order. ![]() Super Mario Land 2: 6 Golden Coins (GB).Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels (NES). ![]() ![]() ![]() Petitioner nevertheless continued to allege that she resided at the in-district address and submitted mail addressed to her at the in-district address to support her claim. with her ‘dad,’” which, according to the assistant superintendent, referred to the out-of-district address. According to the assistant superintendent’s affidavit, during this meeting, petitioner claimed to reside with her aunt at the in-district address but admitted that the students were physically present at the out-of-district address “very often.” In addition, when questioned about the students’ current whereabouts, petitioner admitted that the students “were ‘at home already’. ![]() In response to the assistant superintendent’s letter, petitioner requested a residency meeting, which took place on January 3, 2020. The letter invited petitioner to submit any evidence of the students’ residency by December 18, 2019. This letter indicated that respondent’s determination was based on the fact that surveillance and documentation confirmed that petitioner and the students did not reside at the in-district address. The district’s investigation additionally revealed that petitioner’s vehicle registration and insurance were registered to the out-of-district address in her name.īy letter dated December 11, 2019, respondent’s assistant superintendent for finance and facilities (“assistant superintendent”) informed petitioner of her intent to exclude the students from respondent’s district as non-residents effective December 20, 2019. In addition to this surveillance, respondent conducted a search of public records, which revealed that petitioner co-owned the out-of-district address with her father. Upon arriving at the in-district address, the students exited the vehicle and either boarded the school bus at the in-district address (on four occasions) or entered the in-district address (on two occasions). On each day of surveillance, the investigator observed a vehicle depart the out-of-district address and arrive at the in-district address. Specifically, respondent conducted surveillance on November 26 and 27, 2019, and December 3, 4, 10, and 11, 2019. Specifically, the caller reported that “two children were routinely being dropped off by a car in front of” the in-district address, at which time they “board a istrict school bus on weekday school mornings.” The district thereafter initiated an investigation to determine whether the students resided within respondent’s district.īetween Novemand December 11, 2019, an investigator conducted surveillance on six weekdays at both the in-district address and an address in Wyandanch, New York, which is located outside of the geographical boundaries of respondent’s district (the “out-of-district address”). In or about October 2019, respondent received a report from an anonymous telephone caller alleging that the students did not reside in the district. ![]() Prior to the events described in this appeal, the students were enrolled in respondent’s schools based upon petitioner’s representation that she and the students resided at an address in respondent’s district (the “in-district address”). and daughter, P.A., (the “students”) are not district residents. Tahoe., Interim Commissioner.-Petitioner appeals the decision of the Board of Education of the Half Hollow Hills Central School District (“respondent”) that her niece, K.A.P.-C. from action of the Board of Education of the Half Hollow Hills Central School District regarding residency.įrazer & Feldman, LLP, attorneys for respondent, Christie R. Appeal of E.S., on behalf of her children P.A. ![]() |